Part 1: Human Nature, Race, Evolution

Explores biological anthropology, emphasizing biology and evolution as dynamic processes in an anthropological trajectory guided by moral optimism.

1.1 Human Nature and Anthropology

Anthropology’s search for human nature emphasized shared capacities in particular cultures. But humans are always in process–there is no human nature.

1.2 Evolution and natural selection, anthropologically

Darwin wrote of “descent with modification.” Evolution and natural selection can be problematic and inaccurate terms to describe natural processes.

1.3 Racism and biological anthropology

Every aspect of biological anthropology, from classifying hominin species to debates about Neandertals and Denisovans, potentially enters into racism today.

1.4 Human skulls: Boas head shape studies revalidated

Human head shape is considerably plastic–there is no natural or genetically-determined head shape. The Boas head shape studies have been revalidated.

1.5 Race revival

Anthropology provided new ways to think about race. Boas should have won–race was debunked. But the last decade staged a race revival. How did this happen?

1.6 “Race Reconciled” re-debunks race

“Race Reconciled: How Biological Anthropologists View Human Variation” features an important set of articles re-debunking race.

1.7 Race becomes biology

Anthropology reveals how race becomes biology, intertwining social categories and biology. This is dynamic and developing biology, not genetic determinism.

1.8 So many primates for primatology

Primates vary by species, group, and individually. Primatology reveals there is no single primate behavior pattern at the base of human evolution.

1.9 Bipedalism is also called walking

Habitual bipedalism–not big brains–differentiated hominid ancestors from apes. But walking is a learned behavior, not easily explained by selection.

1.10 Stone tools for 2.5 million years

Stone tools date to 2.5million years ago, yet direct ape-human comparisons persist. As Jonathan Marks comments: “We evolved, get over it.”

1.11 Denisovans and Neandertals as human races

Were Denisovans and Neandertals ancestors of modern humans? A different species? Or sub-species, like races? Anthropology shows porous species boundaries.

1.12 More mothers than Mitochondrial Eve

Embracing Mitochondrial Eve was problematic for anthropology. Recent admixture studies show anthropology should recapture multiregionalism.

1.13 Human biologies

Human biologies offer broad platforms of possibility. Anthropology does not see human nature as determining structures, genes, and instincts.