Update 2018: Since January 2017, I’ve wondered periodically: Why did Occupy Wall Street arise under Obama but seems completely absent under Trump? For another take, see The Commodification of Resistance by Adam P. Johnson on Anthropology 365: “The obvious example is that of the Occupy Wall Street Movement. While it shone light on the inequalities in America, it is hard to acknowledge its long-term success as Donald Trump currently occupies the White House, and is supporting—along with the GOP—policies that will increase socioeconomic inequality within the nation.” Similarly, as much as I want to believe the renewed impetus for gun control is real, I wonder about its durability when election season rolls around.
Anthropology & Occupy
In October 2011, the Neuroanthropology Blog went on a roll. Daniel Lende did all of anthropology a tremendous service with his non-stop coverage of Anthropology-in-Florida. Lende then tag-teamed over to Greg Downey’s extensive and wonderful post: David Graeber: anthropologist, anarchist, financial analyst. The anthropology blogosphere coalesced to support anthropology and support Occupy Wall Street.
The issues raised by Occupy Wall Street are extremely relevant to anthropology. David Graeber’s Debt: The First 5,000 Years is part of a long anthropological tradition of looking differently at issues of value, money, and credit. Anthropology has long asked: Is Capitalism the Best Economic System? Anthropology also has relevant findings about contemporary economic and political inequalities, and how those inequalities get organized around categories of difference such as race (see Social Construction of Race, Conservative Goldmine).
Although an anthropology of contemporary economics and politics is a focus for Living Anthropologically, I was not actively blogging about it at the very time Occupy Wall Street materialized. I admit initial ambivalence. First, I was unsure of the parallels to the Arab Spring–although these tactics seem appropriate for dictatorial regimes, do they make sense in electoral democracies? Second, I was perhaps taken in by the mainstream media portrayal of a lack of coherent message, and even some proponents seemed to say the message was “against greed.” As Max Weber reminds us in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, the capitalist system is actually not developed through greed:
The greed for gold is as old as the history of man. But we shall see that those who submitted to it without reserve as an uncontrolled impulse, such as the Dutch sea-captain who “would go through hell for gain, even though he scorched his sails”, were by no means the representatives of that attitude of mind from which the specifically modern capitalistic spirit as a mass phenomenon is derived, and that is what matters. At all periods of history, wherever it was possible, there has been ruthless acquisition, bound to no ethical norms whatever. (16)
That said, Occupy Wall Street can answer both of these objections. To the first, although the United States is technically an electoral democracy, an entrenched plutocracy dominates most political decisions. To the second, it is also the case that what we have seen in recent decades is a complete overturning of the “ethics of capitalism” in which greed and realizing short-term profit at any cost threatens the very capitalist system that makes such profits possible.
So indeed, Occupy Wall Street seems part of what Immanuel Wallerstein predicted in 1999, a time of profound transition, as the current capitalist system breaks down. What will follow is uncertain, with the potential for reformulation, or something worse, or something better. Human agency takes on heightened meaning: “it is precisely in periods of transition from one historical system to another one (whose nature we cannot know in advance) that human struggle takes on the most meaning” (The End of the World As We Know It, 1999:3).
Occupy Wall Street has done more to bring awareness to inequality than a whole bunch of Op-Eds and blogs.
Updates on Occupy Wall Street
Update November 2013: Had a few random webhits back on this page, so decided to re-visit. It strikes me now–just after writing Political Stakes for an Anthropology of the State during Globalization–that what still does seem under-thought is the specificity of the state and its relationship to capital, both in the United States and in the periphery. Similarly with regard to schooling and the kinds of comments Florida Governor Scott made about anthropology. The truth is that high-quality education is expensive, and we’ve now seen the rhetoric of “they are the 1%” levied against public school teachers and college professors. Strange times.
Please visit Anthropology, Moral Optimism, and Capitalism: A Four-Field Manifesto. That’s the post developing on the themes and comments initially discussed here.
For an update two years on, see Fragmented Globality: Irony, Paradox, Uncertainty from October 2013.
Several more links from October 2011:
- Honored to play a small part in a beautiful, moving post from Daniel Lende, Why We Protest. See the comment stream below for some of the back-and-forth.
- Graeber gets some coverage in the Chronicle article Intellectual Roots of Wall St. Protest Lie in Academe.
- Paul Krugman analyzes the effect in Losing Their Immunity.
- Immanuel Wallerstein says what I thought he might say in “The Fantastic Success of Occupy Wall Street” (I wrote this blog-post before reading his own piece).
To cite: Antrosio, Jason. 2011. “Occupy Wall Street: Anthropological Reflections in and on a Moment.” Living Anthropologically website, https://www.livinganthropologically.com/anthropology-occupy-wall-street/. First posted 16 October 2011. Revised 20 February 2018.