This was a student comment page for Cultural Anthropology 2018-2019 when we read “Shakespeare in the Bush” by Laura Bohannan in the Reader for a Global Age. My most recent lecture on this article was in my Intro-to-Anthropology 2021 course accompanying the textbook Anthropology: What does it mean to be human?

I left student comments open, with one idea for a prompt:

By my estimation, “Shakespeare in the Bush” is second only to “The Nacirema” as the article by an anthropologist most likely to be assigned outside anthropology. It also gets used a lot within anthropology, as an introduction to anthropology in general or as a way of thinking about linguistic anthropology.

In recent years, like with the Nacirema, I’ve begun wondering if Bohannan’s article is still “working” well. Does it still serve to (in the terms of Guest’s textbook Essentials of Cultural Anthropology) “help people of different backgrounds better understand one another”?

What do you think?

Living Anthropologically means documenting history, interconnection, and power during a time of global transformation. We need to care for others as we attempt to build a world together. This blog is a personal project of Jason Antrosio, author of Fast, Easy, and In Cash: Artisan Hardship and Hope in the Global Economy. For updates, follow on Twitter, watch on YouTube, or subscribe to e-mail list.

Living Anthropologically is part of the Amazon Associates program and earns a commission from qualifying purchases, including ads and Amazon text links. There are also Google and Disqus ads, which use cookies and possibly other tracking information.